家ション商店から助いた箱をこますゃるるをまするまするまするしますしますますます。
The handling of the skin or SUV is superior, but this is simply because more frames are required.
Then there’s the RV. Load these same tiles into a class A motorhome and you won’t feel a thing. The frame is huge. The frame adjusts if a lot of sand is attached to it, unless there is a change in weight.
This creates a dangerous blind spot.
This is not intuitive. The car was full of furniture, electronics, televisions and people. To know how much you can count, you need to know a certain number: Goods Loading Capacity.
Sounds like a technical term. this is. But this is simple math.
The CCC Formula
耐荷重 (CCC) is the maximum weight of all products that can cause structural failure, brake problem, and disaster.
Here is how to calculate your RV’s CCC.
-
Start with GVWR. **
This is the gross vehicle weight rating. This is the maximum total mass that the vehicle is designed to support. Let’s use 20,000 pounds** for this example. -
Reduce UVW. **
The weight of the full tank includes the fuel, coolant, and oil tank provided by the manufacturer. This does not include passengers or cargo.
UVW example: 14,500 lbs**. -
Reduce SCWR. **
Weight assessment of sleeping ability is a safety standard. Each passenger is designed to carry a person weighing 154 grams.
Formula: 154 lbs x number of sleeping positions.
Example (6 positions): 924 pounds**. -
Reduce propane weight. **
LPG tanks are heavy. Propane weighs about 4.2 pounds per gallon.
Example (12 gallon tank): 50.4 lbs**. -
Reduce fresh water weight. **
Water is heavy. 8.3 The weight of a box of packed fresh water increases with each additional cell.
Example (25 gallon tank): 207.5 lbs**. -
**Result is CCC. **
Take the GVWR and subtract the UVW, SCWR, propane, and fresh water.
20,000 (GVWR)
– 14,500 (UVW)
– 924 (SCWR)
– 50.4 (propane)
– 207.5 (Water)
= 4,318.1 pounds (CCC)
The amount you can use for everything else is £4,318.1. clothing. gear. food. electronic products. that’s it. When this number is reached, it is overloaded.
Never exceed RV CCC. To be safe, think of it as a hard ceiling.
Where to find technical data
If the box is in your car or box, it doesn’t limit if you need these numbers.
Check the manufacturer’s website. You can also find the CCC list by checking the user manual or contacting the brand directly.
Some manufacturers share detailed diagrams of all their products. Note that some charts list volume (in cubic feet) instead of load capacity. You need to make sure that the rating is both weight and body size.
Acura cargo capacity
Availability varies widely by Acura model. The MDX is a truck. The TL is a sedan with a small trunk.
| Year | Model | Crate capacity (ft3) |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | MDX | 81.5 |
| 2006 | RL | 13.1 |
| 2006 | RSX | 25.3 |
| 2006 | TL | 12.5 |
| 2006 | Toronto Stock Exchange | 13.2 |
| 2007 | MDX | 83.5 |
| 2007 | RL | 13.1 |
| 2007 | RDX | 60.6 |
| 2007 | TL | 12.5 |
| 2007 | Toronto Stock Exchange | 13.2 |
| 2008 | MDX | 83.5 |
| 2008 | RL | 13.1 |
| 2008 | RSX | 60.6 |
| 2008 | TL | 12.5 |
| 2008 | Toronto Stock Exchange | 13.2 |
| 2009 | MDX | 83.5 |
| 2009 | RL | 13.1 |
| 2009 | RSX | 60.6 |
| 2009 | Toronto Stock Exchange | 12.6 |
Acura Details:
– Acura GVWR
– Acura GAWR
– Acura GCWR
– Acura Curb Quality
– Acura Payload
– Acura towing capacity
Audi cargo capacity
Audi’s range varies from the small TT to the large Q7. Note that the new A4 model has a smaller capacity than its predecessor.
| Year | Model | Crate capacity (ft3) |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | A3 | 54.6 |
| 2006 | A4 | 13.4 |
| 2006 | A6 | 15.9 |
| 2006 | A8 | 14.6 |
| 2006 | S4 | 13.4 |
| 2006 | TT | 24.2 |
| 2007 | A3 | 54.6 |
| 2007 | A4 | 13.4 |
| 2007 | A6 | 15.9 |
| 2007 | A8 | 14.6 |
| 2007 | Q7 | 88.7 |
| 2007 | RS4 | 13.4 |
| 2007 | S4 | 13.4 |
| 2007 | S6 | 13.9 |
| 2007 | S8 | 14.6 |
| 2008 | A3 | 54.6 |
| 2008 | A4 | 10.2 |
| 2008 | A5 | 16.1 |
| 2008 | A6 | 15.9 |
| 2008 | A8 | 14.6 |
| 2008 | Q7 | 88.7 |
| 2008 | R8 | 3.5 |
| 2008 | RS4 | 13.4 |
| 2008 | S4 | 13.4 |
| 2008 | S5 | 16.1 |
| 2008 | S6 | 15.9 |
| 2008 | S8 | 14.6 |
| 2008 | TT | 8.8 |
| 2009 | A3 | 54.6 |
| 2009 | A4 | 10.2 |
| 2009 | A5 | 16.1 |
| 2009 | A8 | 14.6 |
| 2009 | Q7 | 88.7 |
| 2009 | R8 | 3.5 |
| 2009 | S4 | 10.2 |
| 2009 | S5 | 16.1 |
| 2009 | S8 | 14.6 |
| 2009 | TT | 8.8 |
Audi detailed specifications:
– Audi GVWR
– Audi GAWR
–
How much can these GM family haulers carry?
The 2006-2009 Buick lineup offers a wide variety of cargo space, depending on whether you’re hauling groceries or small appliances. The midsize sedans, the LaCrosse and Lucerne, aren’t designed for volume. The LaCrosse has 16 cubic feet and the Lucerne has 17 cubic feet. It’s tight. If you need space, consider an SUV.
The Rainier has a cargo space of 80.1 cubic feet. It was a competent hauler that disappeared after the 2007 model year. The Rendezvous offered 108.9 cubic feet of space in 2006 and 2007. Then the Enclave arrived. In 2008, it delivered 116.2 cubic feet. By 2009, the number had dropped slightly to 115 cubic feet. The Terraza, the Pontiac Aztek’s rebadged cousin, is the king of volume here. The 2006 offers 136.5 cubic feet of space.
Cadillac luxury and heavy haulers
Cadillac split its cargo strategy into tight luxury sedans and massive SUVs. were no different the CTS and CTS-V. In 2006 and 2007, they shared 12.5 cubic feet. In 2008 and 2009, this amount increased to 13.6 cubic feet. DTS offered a bit more at 18.8 cubic feet of space over four years. The STS and STS-V have a stuck to 13.8 cubic feet.
The luxury coupes XLR and XLR-V can hardly be used as useful for cargo. They only offer 11.6 cubic feet.
Then there were the tanks. The Escalade started at 104.6 cubic feet in 2006 and increased to 108.9 cubic feet in 2007. The extended ESV version added significant space in space, jumping from 131.6 cubic feet to 137.4 cubic feet. The 2009 Escalade Hybrid has 69.5 cubic feet, the matched the standard the standard SUV. EXT pickups are listed but data is missing.
Chevrolet’s volume leaders
Chevrolet dominates the volume charts. The Express van was an anomaly. From 2006 to 2009, it offered a massive 225.1 cubic feet of capacity. It hasn’t changed. As of 2007, the Suburban 1500 and 2500 each offer 137.4 cubic feet of space. The Tahoe has 108.9 cubic feet of space.
For crossovers and cars and sedans the numbers dropped. The 2007, 2008 and 2009 equinox remained steady at 67.1 cubic feet. The HHR panel offered 62.7 cubic feet, while the standard HHR dropped from 63.1 in 2006 to 57.7 later. The TrailBlazer’s volume settles at 80.1 cubic feet.
The Corvette saw fluctuations. It started at 22.4 cubic feet in 2006, dropped to 11 cubic feet in 2007 and 2008, and returned to 22.4 cubic feet in 2009. The Malibu and Impala offered modest 15 to 18 cubic feet. The Traverse was introduced in 2009 and has a capacity of 117.5 cubic feet.
Chrysler and Dodge’s minivan dominance
Chrysler and Dodge leaned hard into minivans and SUVs. “Town & Country” and “Grand Caravan” were volume monsters. The Town & Country’s capacity in 2006 started at 146.7 cubic feet, dropped to 144 cubic feet, and then stabilized at 143.8 cubic feet. Grand Caravan was slightly larger to 167.9 in 2006 and 2007 and then stabilized at 144.3.
The PT Cruiser offered 92.2 cubic feet in 2006, which dropped to 62.7 cubic feet and then back to 92.2 cubic feet. The Pacifica fluctuated between 62.7 and 92.2. The Aspen SUV has a steady 102.4 cubic feet of space. Sedans like the 300C and Sebring have 15 to 17 cubic feet of space. The Crossfire is small at 6.5-7.6 cubic feet.
Dodge’s Sprinter vans were extreme. The Sprinter Van 2500 had 247 cubic feet in 2006, rising to 318 cubic feet in 2007, 2008 and 2009. The 3500 version went from 247 to 371 cubic feet, up from 247 cubic feet. The Sprinter wagon varied wildly, starting at 321 cubic feet in 2006, dropping to 141.3 cubic feet and staying there then staying there.
The Ram 1500 and 2500 trucks held steady at 41 cubic feet in 2006, 2007 and 2008, but data is missing for the 2009 Ram 1500. Durango’s held is 102.4 cubic feet. The Magnum has a capacity of 71.6 cubic feet. Both the Charger and Challenger offer 16.2 cubic feet of space. Viper started at 6.8, dropped to 8.4, then went up to 8.9.
Why these numbers matter?
These numbers are more than just statistics. These define the practicality of these cars. The CTS’s 13.6-cubic-foot trunk is useless for weekend trips. The 371-cubic-foot Sprinter is a mobile truck. Knowing the Buick’s load capacity will help you decide if the Enclave is really the right kayak for you. Knowing Cadillac’s held will tell you if the Escalade ESV can carry golf clubs and gear without folding the third row.
There is a big difference between the smallest coupe and the biggest wagon. More than 350 cubic meters. This is the difference between a hobby and a job.
Where to find more information
If you want to know how much weight these vehicles can lift or tow, cubic feet only tell half the story. Weight assessment required.
- Buick GVWR
- Buick GAWR
- Buick GCWR
- Buick vehicle weight
- Buick Payload
-
Buick traction
-
Cadillac GVWR
- Cadillac GAWR
- Cadillac GCWR
- The weight of a Cadillac car
- Cadillac Payload
-
Cadillac traction
-
Chevrolet GVWR
- Chevrolet GAWR
- Chevrolet GCWR
- Chevrolet vehicle weight
-
Chevrolet payload
-Chevrolet’s towing capacity -
Chrysler GVWR
- Chrysler GAWR
- Chrysler GCWR
- Chrysler vehicle weight
- Chrysler payload
-
Chrysler towing capacity
-
Dodge GVWR
- Dodge GAWR
- Dodge GCWR
- Avoid self-weight
- Avoid payload
- Evasive traction
Ford’s big trucks and small footprints
Ford’s 2006-2009 lineup ranged from the compact GT with cubic feet to the huge E-Series vans. This is a big gap. If you need to move a sofa, consider the E 150, E 250 or E 350 Super Duty. As of 2008, both have a capacity of 230.6 cubic feet. Previously, in 2006 and 2007, these same workhorses had a capacity of 256.5 cubic feet. GMC’s Savana-compatible products match these numbers perfectly.
Pickup trucks tell a different story. For several years, the F 150, F 250, F 350 and F 450 did not declare a specific cargo capacity for the cargo platform. Usually measured by bed volume in individual specifications. Rangers are small though. In 2006, it had a capacity of 18.1 cubic feet. It disappeared from the list in 2007 and 2009, but returned in 2008 with the same 18.1 cubic feet.
Crossovers and SUVs are the middle ground. The Escape series has about 66 cubic feet of space. In 2006, the Escape Hybrid had a capacity of 65.5, which increased to 66 in 2008. The Explorer’s capacity has remained steady at 85.8 cubic feet for four years. If you need more room, the Expedition EL adds 130.8 cubic feet of capacity for 2007 and 2008. The Flex, introduced in 2009, has a capacity of 83.2 cubic feet.
Small cars are more sensitive. The Mustang never broke double digits, always coming in at 9.7 cubic feet. The GT is even more compact at just 1 cubic foot. Throughout its life, the Fusion was a trunk-only sedan with a volume of 15.8 cubic feet. Taurus improved slightly over time, rising from 17 in 2006 to 21.2 in 2008 and 2009.
GMC and Hummer: utility vehicles and off-road vehicles
GMC’s Savana 1500, 2500 and 3500 trucks are simple in design. From 2006 to 2009, they consistently offered 225.1 cubic feet of space. This is a direct competitor to the Ford E-Series. When comparing Ford vs GMC cargo capacity, these vans have about the same volume, but the Ford E-Series peaked at 256.5 cubic feet the previous year and has since risen to 230.6 cubic feet.
The Sierra 1500, 2500 and 3500 pickups do not have the payload capacities listed here. This is standard for the size of the bed and varies depending on the cab and the length of the bed. There is also no information about the canyon.
The Yukon series offers reliable utility. The Yukon’s standard capacity dropped slightly from 63.6 cubic feet in 2006 to 60.3 cubic feet in 2007, where it remained until 2009. By comparison, the Yukon Hybrid has a much smaller capacity of 16.9 cubic feet. The Yukon XL has a volume of approximately 45.7-45.8 cubic feet.
Envoy stores 43.7 cubic feet per year. The Envoy XL is smaller at 23.4 cubic feet. The newcomer here is Acadia. In 2007, it had a capacity of 19.7 cubic feet, which increased to 25.5 cubic feet in 2008 and remained there until 2009.
Hummer hasn’t changed much. From 2006 to 2009, the H2 had a capacity of 30.7 cubic feet. Over the same period, the H3’s capacity remained steady at 29.5 cubic feet. H3T has no listed information. Although it’s a sturdy brand, it doesn’t have as much cargo space as a full-size van.
Honda Efficiency and Ridgeline
When you look at Honda’s numbers, you see a mix of practical minivans and surprisingly small sports cars. The Odyssey was the king of the group, always boasting 147.4 cubic feet of space from 2006 to 2009. It’s a great option for families that need space without taking up a lot of space.
The CR-V is small by this standard, just 10.4 cubic feet over four years. It is a compact SUV. The Pilot is larger, hovering between 87 and 87.6 cubic feet. The Ridgeline pickup has a total volume of 41.4 cubic feet.
Civic is weird. In 2006 and 2007, it delivered 72 cubic feet and 72.9 cubic feet. It then dropped to 35.7 in 2008. By 2009, it had further dropped to 11.5 cubic feet. This probably reflects a move to the new Civic, which prioritizes trunk space over rear-seat folding volume in this particular measurement. In 2009, the Fit’s volume jumped to 57.3 cubic feet.
Hybrids are always smaller. The Accord Hybrid’s volume remains at 11.2 cubic feet. Civic Hybrid is 11.5. Insight was 16.3 in 2006 but has since disappeared from the list. The minimum size for the S2000 Coupe is 5 cubic feet.
Hyundai vs. Infiniti: Luxury vs. Value
Hyundai entered the US market during this period and its range continued to expand. The Accent went from 12.4 in 2006 to 15.9 in 2007 and stayed the same in 2009. The Elantra is 14.2 to 14.2 in cubic feet. The Sonata’s standard volume is 16.3 cubic feet.
From 2006 to 2008, Tucson had 22.7 cubic feet of cubic feet per year. No information is available for Veracruz. The Santa Fe saw a nice increase from 30.5 in 2006 to 34.2 in 2007 and 2008. The Entourage minivan offers 32.2 cubic feet in 2007 and 2008. The Genesis sedan, introduced in 2009, has a capacity of 15.9 cubic feet. The Tiburon is smaller at 14.8 cubic feet.
Infiniti promotes luxury in space. The QX56 is quite large, with 91.7 cubic feet of year-round space. FX models remained at 64.5 cubic feet until 2009, but in 2009 the FX35 and FX50 dropped capacity to 62 cubic feet. The volume of the M35 and M45 remains the same at 14.9 cubic feet. By 2008, the G35’s capacity increased from 7.8 cubic feet to 13.5 cubic feet, while the G37’s capacity has since dropped to just 7.4 cubic feet. Introduced in 2008, the EX35 has a capacity of 18.6 cubic feet. The Q45 is small at 13.6 cubic feet.
Isuzu, Jaguar and small brands
Isuzu is on the decline. The Ascender was sold from 2006 to 2008 and had a capacity of 80.1 cubic feet. About i-280, i-290, i-350 and i-370 pickups are not listed. This reflects Isuzu’s share of the US passenger car market, which has been shrinking in recent years.
Jaguar focuses primarily on sedans and coupes. The S-Type has a capacity of 28.6 cubic feet. The X-Type is 16. The XJ8 and XJR make do with 16.4 cubic feet. The XK8 and XKR tightened to 11.5 in 2006 and dropped to 7.1 in 2007. It then stabilized at 10.6 in 2008-2009. The XF sedan was introduced in 2009 with a volume of 17.7 cubic feet. The XK Coupe also has 10.6 cubic feet of space.
These numbers don’t tell the whole story about availability. A 20-cubic-foot trunk in a luxury sedan feels different than a 20-cubic-foot trunk in a utility vehicle. However, when comparing **Ford
Jeep 2006-2009 load guide
The 2006 Jeep lineup is showing its age. The Commander has 68.7 cubic feet of cargo space. The Grand Cherokee isn’t far behind at 67.4. Liberty offers slightly more space at 69 cubic feet. The Wrangler is naturally the least practical hauler, with just 45.8 cubic feet.
By 2007, Jeep introduced two new models. The Compass offers 53.6 cubic feet of space. The Patriot offered 62.7. The Commander gained a rating of 68.9. The Grand Cherokee stayed flat. The Liberty is still 69 cubic feet. The Wrangler’s volume jumps significantly to 61.2 cubic feet, likely due to design tweaks.
The data for 2008 and 2009 show stability. Commanders decreased slightly to 68.5. The Compass held steady at 53.6. The Grand Cherokee was locked at 67.4. Liberty fell to 64.2. The Patriot stayed at 62.7. The Wrangler also held at 61.2.
The correct name is “Wrangler Unlimited”. For 2008 and 2009, it offers up to 86.8 cubic feet of cargo capacity. This is a significant difference between two-door and four-door models. This makes the Unlimited the clear choice for overland travelers who need room for recovery gear and camping gear.
KIA Cargo Bay 2006-2009
Kia’s strategy in this era was volume. The Sedona minivan dominated. In 2006, it offered 141.5 cubic feet. By 2007 and 2008, the figure had dropped slightly to 121.3. It remained there until 2009.
The mid-size options were tighter. Between 2006 and 2008, the Optima had a total capacity of 14.8 cubic feet. The Rio sedan is even smaller at 11.9. The Rio five-door hatchback is more practical: It jumped to 49.6 cubic feet in 2006 and 2008, but dropped to 15.8 cubic feet in 2007. Why did it drop in 2007? Maybe the packaging has changed or measurement standard shift, but the data is what it is.
The Rondo delivered 74.4 cubic feet in 2007 and 2008. The Sportage and Sorento consistently delivered 66.6 cubic feet and 66.4 cubic feet from 2006-2008.
In 2009, Kia refreshed its lineup. The Borrego comes in at 97.6 cubic feet. That’s a solid figure for a midsize SUV competitor. The Spectra 5-door has 52.8 cubic feet of space. The sedan Spectra remained at a meager 12.2.
If you’re wondering how much space the Kia Sedona offers compared to its competitors, you’ll find that while interior quality varies, it leads the class in sheer volume.
Land Rover Cargo Volume 2006-2009
Land Rover had a weird period here. The LR3 was the workhorse. In 2006 and 2007, it delivered 90.3 cubic feet. Then in 2008, the data showed a curious drop to 9.9 cubic feet. This is not a typo in the source data, but it is physically impossible for the LR3 with the seats folded down. This could be a data error in that year’s entry or a misunderstanding of a particular lineup. which returned to 90.3 cubic feet in 2009.
The Range Rover was more consistent. In 2006, it was 74.9 cubic feet. 2007 matched that. It dropped to 35.1 in 2008 and recovered to 74.2 in 2009. The 2008 numbers are considered an outlier. This is likely due to differences in measurement methods or certain equipment level restrictions.
In 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009, the displacement of the Range Rover Sport remained constant at 71 cubic feet.
The LR2 (Disco 3) entered the picture in 2008 with no data listed, then in 2009 with a capacity of 58.9 cubic feet. This puts it below the larger LR3 and Range Rover models, which is to be expected given its smaller footprint.
Lexus cargo capacity 2006-2009
Lexus sedans were not built for hauling. The ES 330 (2006) offers 14.5 cubic feet of space. ES 350 (2007-2009) increases to 14.7. IS 250 and IS 350 are fixed at 13.0. The IS-F is a very capable sedan that cost just $13.30 in 2008.
The GS line is just as tight. The GS 300, GS 350, GS 430 and GS 460 are all about 12.7 cubic feet. The hybrid GS 450h fared even worse, offering only 7.5 cubic feet in 2007 and 2008.
SUVs are the only way to get space. The GX 470 always offers 77.5 cubic feet of space. The LX 470 is the largest, at 90.4 cubic feet. It was replaced in 2008 by the LX 570 with 15.5 cubic feet for seats up. No, that figure is likely for seats up. The 2009 LX 570 has 83.1 cubic feet of space. This is a big difference. The 2008 figure of 15.5 is an outlier for a full-size SUV and may represent just the cargo area without folding seats or other data anomalies. The 2009 figures are more in line with the capacity of a typical luxury SUV.
The RX 330, RX 350 and RX 400h offer 84.7 to 85 cubic feet of space. The 2008 RX 350 bottomed out with supposedly “seats” 38.3 and 85 with the seats folded. Always check your configuration.
The SC 430 Coupe is small. 8.8 cubic meters. It has been consistent over the years.
Lincoln Cargo Bay 2006-2009
Lincoln rode behind the Ford pickup. A city car is a sedan. In 2006, 2007 and 2008, it offered 21.1 cubic feet of space. In 2009, it stayed there. There is not much space to store luggage.
The navigator is a beast. 2006: 104.8 cubic feet. 2007: 103.5. 2008: 103.5. 2009: 104.7. It is the largest vehicle in the area. If you need to move the piano, you can use the navigator.
The Mark LT is a hybrid pick-up and SUV. In 2006, 2007 and 2008, it offered 47.9 cubic feet of capacity. Data for 2009 are not available. Most likely because the model was discontinued or replaced by an F-150-based truck and the introduction of the Ford badge.
The MKX was introduced in 2007 and has a capacity of 69 cubic feet. In 2008 and 2009, the ranking was only 69 points. This is a solid investment for mid-size luxury SUVs.
The MKZ (and 2006 Zephyr) has 15.8 cubic feet of space. Will the MKS somehow replace or sit on top of the MKZ? For 2009, the MKS offers 18.7 cubic feet of space. A little more than the MKZ, but not much.
Mazda cargo capacity 2006-2009
Mazda has a wide range of products. MPV minibuses are large. In 2006, it was 127 cubic feet. There are no later MPV figures from this group, which will likely be replaced by the CX-9.
The CX-9 is the new king. It came in 2007 and has a capacity of 100.7 cubic feet. It maintained this number in 2008 and 2009. It is a direct competitor to the Highlander and Traverse.
Mitsubishi and Nissan trunk
The 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander is a practical truck. Offers 60.3 cubic feet of space. This is quite large for a compact crossover. Compare to the 2006 Nissan Pathfinder. The Nissan offers 79.2 cubic feet. The difference is huge. Pathfinder is designed with practicality in mind. Outlander is built for efficiency.
Mitsubishi’s lineup is changing rapidly. By 2007, the Outlander’s volume had dropped to 36.2 cubic feet. Endeavor stabilized at 40.7. However, the Raider disappeared. Mitsubishi also didn’t release cargo information for the vehicle in 2008. The Eclipse has 15.7 cubic feet, but it’s still boring. Every year since 2006. No changes. There is no evolution. The same small trunk of the car that never caught fire.
Nissan took a different approach. The 2006 Quest is a van disguised as an SUV. Offers 148.7 cubic feet of space. This figure dropped sharply in 2007 to 145.7. Then in 2008 it went back to 148.1. Why is the rise so sudden? Nissan has changed the way it measures rear seats. Or maybe they just fixed a typo. The Altima got weird in 2008. It dropped to 7.4 cubic feet In 2006 it was 15.6. It’s a big cut. Did they install a battery pack The 2007 and 2008 hybrid Altimas have a capacity of 10.1 cubic feet. It’s more efficient. The space will be smaller.
The Nissan Rogue entered the conversation in 2008. It offered 98 cubic feet This is a huge little crossover. But in 2009, it shrunk to 28.9 cubic feet. you read that right. The Rogue loses two-thirds of its trunk space in one model year. Unless you count the hybrid Altima as a competitor. The displacement of the car is only 10.1 cubic feet. Not much for groceries
End of Pontiac
Pontiac didn’t care about space. The GTO offers 7 cu. It is smaller than the smart fortwo. The Solstice started with 3.8 cubic feet It then rose to 7.5 in 2007. Then it returned to 5.4 in 2008 and remains at that level. This is a sports car. It is not bought for your suitcase. You buy it to hear the engine
Grand Prix was the only sensible choice for Pontiac. In 2006, it was 57.1 cubic feet. In 2007 it was 16 cubic feet. In 2008, it was 45.7. Then in 2009 it went back to 45.7. The figures for 2007 appear to be typos. Or a fatal technical failure. You couldn’t fit a suitcase in the 2007 Grand Prix
The Montana SV6 is a crossover minibus. The capacity is 136.5 cubic feet. It’s a truck zone. But Pontiac killed the brand before we could fully appreciate it. The Torrent offered 68.6 cubic feet in 2006. Then in 2007 it offered 32.2 cubic feet. Then in 2008 it went back to 68.6. The second row had to have a memory function. Or maybe our 2007 tester simply forgot to fold the seats.
The Vibe was the sensible one 54.1 cubic feet. In the years 2006-2008 it was 49.4 in 2009. Small declines. Sound insulation work can also be done. Or maybe you just ran out of ideas. Pontiac was dying. You could feel it in the shrinking trunks
The reality of Porsche and rear engines
Porsche doesn’t do cargo. Not really In 2008, there was no room for the 911. A dash. That’s it As of 2009, the Carrera had a capacity of 7.24 cubic feet. This is a sports car. Instead of putting things into it, you put your ego into it.
Boxster and Cayman are slightly better. The Boxster has a volume of 9.9 cubic feet. 14.5 for the Cayman These are mid-engined cars. The suitcase is behind you. You can pack your gym bag. If you fold the seat, you might even get a golf club. But don’t expect to pack for a week.
Cayenne is an exception. 62.5 cubic feet Every year. 2006, 2008, 2009. This is a luxury SUV. Space is needed. This is the only Porsche that can transport a family. Or you have a lot of luggage. Or both. If you want a Porsche that can haul stuff, buy a Cayenne. If you want speed, get the 911 You can’t have it both ways.
Saab’s market niche
Saab stuck to its guns The 9-7X is a Tahoe with a turbocharger. The capacity is 80.1 cubic feet. Every year. 2006-2009. No changes. No improvement. Same boxy back. This is a camouflaged truck.
The 9-5 Sedan has 15.9 cubic feet of space. Continuous. boring. Reliable. The 9-3 started at 14.8 cubic feet in 2006 and went up to 15 cubic feet in 2007 and 2008. Then it dropped to 12.4 cubic feet in 2009. Need a smaller trunk for a sportier look? Perhaps. Or maybe the materials are just cheap. The 9-2X is a Subaru Impreza with a Saab badge. The capacity is 61.6 cubic feet. A wagon Practical. Unexciting
Saab was disappearing The figures have not changed. However, the brands were fading The 9-7X was the ultimate in practicality. After that there was nothing. Only empty showrooms and quiet streets.
Saturn hybrid experiment
Saturn tried to be clever with hybrids The Aura Hybrid offers 13.1 cubic feet of space. The regular Aura offered 14.9 The hybrid lost space for batteries This is the price of going green. The VUE Hybrid does the same thing. In 2007, it was 63.8 cubic feet. In 2008, it was 56.4. In 2009 it was 29.2. A steady decline. Why? Maybe the battery is bigger. Maybe the seats got thicker Or maybe Saturn has simply stopped making accurate measurements.
The Outlook is a disguised Buick Enclave. The capacity is 115.9 cubic feet. Every year. 2007, 2008, 2009. Large transport vehicle. If you need space, it’s there. But Saturn sinks. The Outlook was a life raft The brand could not be saved. It just provides a place to put your luggage if the ship sinks.
The Sky was a roadster 5.4 cubic feet Every year. 2007, 2008, 2009. No changes. There is no evolution. Just a small trunk for a small car In 2008, the Astra offered 44.8 cubic feet of space. Then it disappeared in 2009. Saturn has a year left. Astra is also missing. Just like the brand
Scion’s practical appeal
Scion focuses on young people. And young people don’t need a lot of space. The TC offers 12.8 cubic feet. Every year. 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009. Consistent. Predictable. boring. But it is reliable.
xB is a true hero. In 2006, it was 43.4 cubic feet. In 2008 and 2009, it was 69.9 cubic feet. Significant growth. Why? Scion adds space. Or maybe they just stopped lying about their measurements. The xD offers 35.7 cubic feet. Every year. 2008 and 2009. An ambitious small hatchback.
Scion is Toyota’s answer to the youth market. They don’t care about luxury. They value practicality. xB is a box. It carries things. that’s it. Nothing extra. There are no fancy engines. Just space And a cool badge
Smart has a small footprint
The Smart Fortwo has 12 cubic feet of space. 2008. That’s it. 1 year. There is one model. numbers. This is a city car. You don’t buy it for cargo Buy this if you want to park your bike in a storage space. If you need to bring a suitcase, you can’t. If you have to carry a bag, you can. perhaps. Fortwo is a lifestyle choice. It’s not a practical car. This is a statement. “I don’t need space, I need style.” And style takes up space.
Subarus
Actual load capacity of Toyota (2006-2009)
Toyota doesn’t just make toys. They made household appliances. If you’re looking for mid-2000s Toyota cargo carrying capacity numbers, these numbers speak more for practicality than luxury. The Sienna was king here, offering 148.9 cubic feet of capacity in 2006, 2007 and 2008. That’s huge. You can put a small bedroom there. The volume of the Sequoia is approximately 128.1 cubic feet.
But let’s talk about compacts. The Corolla trunk was tiny. In 2006, it was 13.6 cubic feet. By 2009, it had dropped to 12.3 cubic feet. Why? Maybe they moved the spare wheel. Maybe they added soundproofing. who knows. The Camry isn’t much better, varying between 15 and 16.7 cubic feet depending on the model year.
The Matrix was the outlier. A boxy hatchback that makes a lot of sense.
Then there’s the Matrix. From 2006 to 2007, it was 53.2 cubic feet. It then rose to 61.5 in 2009. This is a big change. It is one of the few compact cars that can actually carry heavy loads. The Prius? Not so much. In 2006, it was 16.1 cubic feet. In 2007 and 2008, it was 14.4 cubic feet. This is a hybrid sedan. It wasn’t designed for lumber.
The 4Runner remains stable. From 2006 to 2009, it was 75.1 cubic feet per year. If you want a truck that won’t change your mind when it comes to storage, this is the one for you. Highlander has grown over time. In 2006, it was 39.7. In 2007, it was 80.6. In 2008, it was 95.4. The space has doubled in two years. The hybrid version is slightly delayed, probably due to the location of the battery, which takes up the rear. 10.5, then 80.6, then 94.1.
What about the trucks? Tacoma and Tundra have no stated capacity. That’s because they’re pickups. The cargo space of a pickup truck is not measured in cubic feet of the closed trunk. You can measure it with something that can be tied to the bed. The data stops there.
German efficiency at Volkswagen
Volkswagen is playing a different game in this era. The main character is the Golf GTI. In 2006, it was 41.8 cubic feet. In 2007, 2008 and 2009 it was 46 cubic feet. Not much has changed. This is a hatchback. Should be flexible.
Beetles are… weird. The trunk of a convertible is pathetic. 5 cubic feet. A laptop bag and sneakers can be stored. coupe? 27.1. Much better, but still crowded. The Passat sedan is average. 14.2 cubic feet. Consistent. Boring.
In some years, the Rabbit offers more space than the Golf.
The Rabbit was a interesting spec. 46 cubic feet in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009. Equivalent to GTI. But the Jetta sedan was stuck at 16. It never grew. From 2006 to 2009, the figure was 16. The introduction of the 66.9-cubic-foot Sport Wagon in 2009 made no changes to the sedan.
The Touareg SUV offers consistent performance. In 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 it was 71 cubic feet. It’s not going to revolutionize storage. That’s how reliable it is. 2006 Phaeton? 13 cubic feet. A luxury sedan that couldn’t carry a suitcase.
The Routan in 2009 was a new entry. 141 cubic feet. This is a rebuilt Dodge Grand Caravan. It competed directly with the Sienna. But for a German brand, this is strange.
Volvo’s understated practicality
Volvo didn’t shout about specs. They just list them. The S80 sedan is small. In 2006, it was 14.4 cubic feet. In 2007, 2008 and 2009, it was 14.9 cubic feet. There is almost no growth. S60? In 2006, it was 36.5 cubic feet. Then it dropped to 13.9 in 2007. Then it went back to 36.5 in 2008 and 2009. Why did it drop in 2007? Safety structure. Heavier frame. Less room.
The V-series wagons were the real deal. The V70 offered 71.4 cubic feet in 2006 and 2007. 72.1 in 2008 and 2009. It’s almost the same as the XC70. Crossover version of the V70. 71.4, then 72, then 72, then 72.
The XC90 is the biggest. In 2006, it was 84.9.
